7 days · fixed price · your real ICP
Stop posting on IndieHackers.
Get a yes/no in 7 days.
Automated Facebook ads and landing pages for vibe-coded SaaS. We run the campaigns end-to-end and show you what's working, what's not, and which ICP actually buys.
7 days · $500–$1,500 flat · Your ICP, not r/SaaS lurkers
Problem
"I'll just post it on IH for free."
You ship the fake-door on a Saturday. Sunday you post it on IndieHackers, r/SaaS, X. By Wednesday you have 12 upvotes, four "looks cool!" comments, and zero buyers. Other founders nodding at your idea is not a market.
Two more weeks of refreshing the analytics tab. Maybe a paid X post. The signal never gets sharper because the audience never changes — it's other people building, not the people you'd sell to.
By week three you've burned 20+ hours of your week, you still don't have a number, and v2 is starting to feel like the safer bet than knowing. So you just build it.
How it works
A 7-day validation pack, end-to-end.
-
1 Minute 1Paste your idea
Drop a paragraph about the idea and your ICP guess. The system auto-generates the landing-page headline, the Facebook ad creative, and the targeting it'll start with — same minute, no human in the loop.
-
2 Days 1–6Auto-launch
Your landing page goes live on a real subdomain. Facebook ads launch the same hour. The funnel auto-tracks every click, scroll, and CTA-press — and the system splits the spend across segments to find the buyer.
-
3 Day 7Live verdict
Watch CTR, CTA-press, and segment breakdowns update in real time. On day 7 you get a one-page yes/no — what worked, what didn't, and which ICP actually buys. No deck. No call required.
What's automated
Four moving parts. The system runs all four.
Auto-generated landing page
Paste a paragraph. The system writes the headline, hero, three feature blurbs, and a primary CTA — published to a real subdomain in under a minute. No Figma. No copywriter. No Webflow rabbit hole.
Drop in a screenshot or a one-pager and the page picks them up; otherwise the whole marketing surface is generated from scratch.
Hero · v2
AI-generated changelog summaries for B2B PMs.
Stop writing release notes. Get a 3-bullet summary auto-posted to your changelog every Thursday.
Stop guessing if your idea sells. Yes/no in 7 days, in front of your real ICP.
Creative + targeting auto-generated. Spend auto-split across segments.
Facebook ads, automated end-to-end
The system writes the ad copy, generates the creative, picks the targeting, and launches the campaign on Meta. We handle the ad account, the spend rules, and the segment splits — you never open Ads Manager.
Ads run in front of people who'd actually swipe a card — not the build-in-public crowd lurking on IH or X.
Live ICP breakdown
A flat CTR tells you what happened. The breakdown tells you who. The dashboard segments converters in real time by job title, company size, and ad cohort — so a "no" can still tell you the wrong audience didn't bite.
Two of every five soft-no runs end up restarting with a different segment and clearing the threshold.
Pack #038 · ICP breakdown
| Segment | CTR | CTA-press |
|---|---|---|
| Eng-mgr · 10–50 | 4.1% | 2.6% |
| PM · 50–200 | 2.7% | 0.9% |
| Founder · 1–5 | 2.1% | 0.4% |
| Dev · 1–10 | 1.4% | 0.2% |
Re-run on the green row → likely yes.
Drop-off · by section
Pricing was the cliff — readers bounced before the CTA.
Drop-off heatmap + verdict
Section-level bounce, scroll depth, and click attempts — so you know what to fix if you re-run. Plus a Bayesian yes/no on CTR + CTA-press scored against the ICP segment, with the two or three signals it's based on.
Not a score. Not a vibe. A verdict you can act on Sunday night.
What you get out of it
Four outcomes. One Sunday-night verdict.
-
Skip the 8-hour copy-and-design rabbit hole — your weekend stays yours, and the page is live before Monday standup.
-
Get the "no" from buyers, not from other founders. When a pack hard-no's an idea, you know it's the idea — not that the wrong audience didn't bite.
-
A soft no is still actionable: the segment table tells you who to re-target, instead of leaving you with "I guess no one wanted it."
-
Kill the idea with conviction or rerun with a fix in mind — either way, you're not coding v2 of something that wouldn't have sold.
Reviews
Builders who'd rather know than build.
I built three SaaS ideas with Lovable last year. Two I posted on IH, got 14 upvotes between them, then spent a month coding each. Both flopped. Pack #027 cost $700 and killed my fourth idea in seven days — wrong ICP entirely. That's three months I didn't burn on the wrong v2.
"Why isn't this just a checkbox in Lovable already?"
$500 to find out my ICP wasn't who I thought — cheap.
It's the only validation step I trust now. I run packs back-to-back — kill or commit, then the next one.
Before: ship a fake-door, post on r/SaaS, pretend the silence was "still gathering signal." Now: a verdict by Sunday. Two of my last four ideas got hard-no'd — saved me ~$8k in compute and weekends.
Sample output
One page. Every number you need to decide.
- CTR + CTA-press — who clicked the ad, who pressed the buy button.
- ICP breakdown — who converted, by job title, company size, channel.
- Drop-off heatmap — where readers bounce on the page.
- Yes/no with reasons — a verdict + the two or three signals behind it.
How we score yes/no — Bayesian thresholds on CTR + CTA-press, broken out by ICP segment. So a 2% CTR in front of the right cohort beats a 5% CTR in front of the wrong one.
Built for builders who'd rather pay $700 to kill an idea than spend a month coding the wrong thing.
See a sample report →Sign up
Drop your email and we'll get back to you within 24h to kick off your pack.
Stop coding the wrong v2.
A fake-door page, paid traffic in front of your real buyer, and a 1-page yes/no — in 7 days. Pick a pack and we start Monday.
We run three packs a week. Most weeks they're spoken for by Wednesday.